†Chapter 25 – Science and research and Chapter 26 – Education and culture are provisionally closed. Chapter 34 - Institutions is currently not applicable.
Serbia and Montenegro deposited their instrument of ratification of the Rome Statute on 6 September 2001. The Rome Statute entered into force on 1 July 2002.[3]
Negotiations with the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (later the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro) intensified following the overthrow of Slobodan Milošević in 2000, and the EU officially declared the Balkan states potential candidates for membership following the EU-Western Balkans Summit in Thessaloniki on 21 June 2003.[10]
^Montenegro started negotiations in November 2005 while a part of Serbia and Montenegro (SiM). Separate technical negotiations were conducted regarding issues of sub-state organizational competency. A mandate for direct negotiations with Montenegro was established in July 2006. Direct negotiations were initiated on 26 September 2006 and concluded on 1 December 2006.[15]
^Serbia started negotiations in November 2005 while part of SiM, with a modified mandate from July 2006.
^Kosovo declared independence from Serbia in 2008 but is still claimed by Serbia as part of its territory. The European Union remains divided, with five EU member states not recognizing its independence. The EU launched a Stabilisation Tracking Mechanism for Kosovo] on 6 November 2002 with the aim of aligning its policy with EU standards. On 10 October 2012 the European Commission found that there were no legal obstacles to Kosovo signing a SAA with the EU, as independence is not required for such an agreement.[19]
^ abcNo Interim Agreement associated with Kosovo's SAA was concluded.[23]
^Kosovo's SAA was the first signed after the entry into force of the Lisbon treaty, which conferred a legal personality to the EU. As a result, unlike previous SAAs Kosovo's is exclusively between it and the EU and Euratom, and the member states are not parties independently.[20][24][25]
Serbia received full candidate status on 1 March 2012. In December 2013, the Council of the European Union approved opening negotiations for Serbia's accession.
Application
Serbia officially applied for European Union membership on 22 December 2009.
Developmental Aid
Until 2020, Serbia had been receiving €2.9bn of developmental aid from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, a funding mechanism for EU candidate countries.
Chronology of relations with the EU
Timeline
Date
Event
1998
The EU Council of Ministers establishes political and economic conditionality for the development of bilateral relations.
21 June 2003
The Stabilisation and Association Process is confirmed as the EU policy for the Western Balkans. The EU's perspective on these countries is confirmed.
October 2004
European Council conclusions open up a process for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SSA).
October 2005
Negotiations for a Stabilisation and Association Agreement are launched.
3 May 2006
SAA negotiations called off due to lack of progress on cooperation with the ICTY.
13 June 2007
SAA negotiations with Serbia resumed, following a clear commitment by the country to achieve full cooperation with the ICTY.
1 November 2007
Serbia's SAA is initialed.
1 January 2008
Entry into force of the Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreement between Serbia and the EU.
18 February 2008
Council adopts revised European partnership for Serbia.
29 April 2008
The Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) and Interim agreement on trade and trade-related issues between Serbia and the EU are signed in Luxembourg.
Serbia refused to join international sanctions against Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In response, the European Parliament passed a resolution that stated in part it "strongly regrets Serbia’s non-alignment with EU sanctions against Russia, which damages its EU accession process."[27]
The biggest obstacle to Serbia's accession to the EU is its strained relationship with Kosovo,[5] which escalated after the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence. The Serbian government has declared that the status of Kosovo should not be tied to the EU negotiations. In September 2012, the EU Enlargement Commissioner, Štefan Füle, denied that the European Union would insist on Serbia's recognition of Kosovo before it can join the organisation.[28]
On 19 April 2013, the governments of Kosovo and Serbia completed the Brussels Agreement, which was hailed as a major step towards normalising relations and enabled the start of EU accession talks with Serbia.[29] In November 2013, Kosovo's Minister of Foreign AffairsEnver Hoxhaj suggested that the EU should approve the accession of Kosovo and Serbia simultaneously due to concerns that if Serbia was admitted first they could veto Kosovo's membership.[30] However, Serbia's accession negotiations were not halted.
In March 2021, the European Parliament adopted a report on Serbia, which, amongst other things, emphasized that the normalization of relationships between Serbia and Kosovo is "a priority and a requirement for EU accession."[31]
Negotiations
No further progress on the opening or closing of chapters have been achieved since December 2021. Benchmarks were met for the opening of all 3 remaining chapters in cluster 3 (chapter 10, 16 and 19) in December 2024, but this was postponed due the opening being conditional on "substantial further progress made by Serbia, in particular in accordance with...the rule of law (chapter 23+24) and the normalisation of relations with Kosovo".[32][33]
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments
Unopened
Moderately prepared
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights
Open
Some level of preparation
24. Justice, Freedom & Security
Open
Moderately prepared††
25. Science & Research
Chapter Closed
Good level of preparation
26. Education & Culture
Chapter Closed
Good level of preparation
27. Environment & Climate Change
Open
Some level of preparation
28. Consumer & Health Protection
Unopened
Moderately prepared
29. Customs Union
Open
Good level of preparation
30. External Relations
Open
Moderately prepared
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy
Unopened
Moderately prepared
32. Financial Control
Open
Moderately prepared
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions
Open
Some level of preparation
34. Institutions
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
35. Other Issues – Normalisation with Kosovo
Open
Further efforts needed
Legend:
Chapters in bold indicate completed chapters.
† indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "moderately prepared" AND "good level of preparation".
†† indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "some level of preparation" AND "moderately prepared".
totally incompatible early stage considerable efforts needed some level of preparation further efforts needed moderately prepared no major difficulties expected good level of preparation well prepared / well advanced
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments
Considerable efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights
Considerable efforts needed
Some level of preparation
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
24. Justice, Freedom & Security
Considerable efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Moderately prepared††
25. Science & Research
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
26. Education & Culture
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Some level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
27. Environment
Early stage
Considerable efforts needed
Considerable efforts needed
Some level of preparation
Early stage
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
28. Consumer & Health Protection
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
29. Customs Union
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
Good level of preparation
30. External Relations
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Further efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
32. Financial Control
Early stage
Early stage
Considerable efforts needed
Considerable efforts needed
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
Moderately prepared
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions
Early stage
Early stage
Early stage
Early stage
Early stage
Early stage
Early stage
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
Some level of preparation
34. Institutions
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
Currently not applicable for Serbia
35. Other Issues Normalisation with Kosovo
Early stage
Early stage
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Further efforts needed
Legend:
Chapters in bold indicate completed chapters.
† indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "moderately prepared" AND "good level of preparation".
†† indicates chapters in which the European Commission has simultaneously awarded the chapter both "some level of preparation" AND "moderately prepared".
totally incompatible early stage considerable efforts needed some level of preparation further efforts needed moderately prepared no major difficulties expected good level of preparation well prepared / well advanced
Serbia working on fulfilment of opening benchmarks
13. Fisheries
Opened
22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments
Opening Benchmarks Assessment Report in Council
33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions
Opened
External relations
30. External Relations
Opened
–
–
31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy
Screening Report in Council
34. Institutions
–
–
–
35. Other Issues: Relations with Kosovo*
Opened
Opened
–
Public opinion
Serbia was initially supportive of accession in the past due to better relationships with countries in the European Union, as well as for economic reasons. In the last decades because of the support of Kosovo's independence by most European countries, the economic crisis, the better relationships with the United States in addition to giving sanctions against Russia during the Russian invasion in Ukraine, support for EU membership went down. Serbia has become more opposed to the Western NATO bloc and prefer better ties and relationships with, for example, Russia for its shared Eastern Orthodox ChristianSlavic traditions and China with its large economy and similar soft alliance with Russia.[citation needed]
A February 2024 NSPM poll recorded that 42.8% were for joining the EU, with 36.8% against. The rest were undecided or refused to give the answer. Another poll recorded the question "Would you support joining the EU if recognizing the independence of Kosovo was a condition for joining it?", 76% answered no, compared to 12.2% who said yes.[50]
An October 2023 Smart Plus poll found that if a referendum on joining the EU would take place, 44% would vote in favour of joining the EU, with 30% voting against, 15% undecided and 10% abstaining.[51]
Data by the Serbian Ministry of European Integration
On 1 January 2008, the Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreement between Serbia and the EU came into effect. On 19 December 2009, Visa requirements were lifted for Serbs travelling to Schengen countries.
Samardžić, Slobodan (2009). Samardžić, Slobodan (ed.). "The Kosovo-Metohija problem from the European integrations angle". Serbia in the European Union Association Process, Službeni Glasnik: 193–238.
Jovanović Nadica; Gardašević Jovana; Vapa-Tankosić Jelena (2015). "Strategija procesa proširenja Evropske unije i društveno-ekonomski efekti integracije Republike Srbije". Poslovna Ekonomija. 9 (2): 191–212.
Gajić, Tamara (2015). "Ulazak Srbije u EU, civilno društvo i politička kultura". Politikon. 10: 119–131.