Constitutional Court of Guatemala

Constitutional Court of Guatemala
Corte de Constitucionalidad de la República de Guatemala
Building of the Constitutional Court
Location	Zone 1, Guatemala City
Number of positions	10
Website	www.cc.gob.gt/

This article is part of a series on
Politics of Guatemala
Legal framework Constitution of Guatemala Human rights LGBT rights Abortion law Capital punishment
Executive President of Guatemala Bernardo Arévalo Vice President of Guatemala Karin Herrera Ministries Secretariats
Legislature Guatemalan Congress Leadership President Nery Ramos 1st Vice President Darwin Lucas Paiz 2nd Vice President César Amézquita 3rd Vice President Nery Rodas
Judiciary Supreme Court of Justice of Guatemala President Oscar Cruz Oliva Sagastume Palacios Padilla Coyoy Duarte Castañeda Roca Calderón Méndez Barrera Carillo Palacios Constitutional Court of Guatemala President Héctor Hugo Pérez Aguilera Pimentel Arriaga Barreto Escribá Contreras Pérez Villatoro Texaj Marroquín
Elections Recent Elections 2023 2019 2015 2011 2007 Administrative divisions Departments Municipalities
Political parties AZUL BIEN CABAL CAMBIO CREO ELEFANTE PPN SEMILLA TODOS UNE VALOR VAMOS VICTORIA VIVA VOS WINAQ Former parties List of political parties
Foreign relations Ministry of Foreign Affairs Minister: Carlos Ramiro Martínez Diplomatic missions of / in Guatemala Nationality law Passport Visa requirements Visa policy Belize Cuba India Kosovo Mexico Peru Russia Spain Taiwan Turkey United States Uruguay Venezuela
Guatemala portal Other countries
v t e

The Constitutional Court of Guatemala is the highest court for constitutional law in the Republic of Guatemala. It is tasked with preserving the constitutional order by ruling on questions of the constitutionality of laws or state actions. The Court is normally composed of five titular or primary magistrates who serve five year terms. Each titular magistrate is appointed with a substitute. In special cases two substitutes are added to the bench for a total of seven to hear that case. Each titular member serves for one year as the president of the court.

The Court was established by Guatemala's 1985 Constitution.^[1] The 1985 Constitution was written after the suspension of the prior constitution as part of Efraín Ríos Montt's Coup d'état on March 23, 1982. His regime suspended the constitution and the subsequent years demonstrated the need for stronger protections and thus a new constitution.

The Guatemalan Constitution lists nine broad functions of the Constitutional Court. These duties serve to establish state overreach but is not equal to the Supreme Court of the United States because it is not a control institution; its sole purpose is the interpretation of the constitution and see to that the laws and regulations are not superior to this. Instead, the Guatemalan Constitutional Court splits final appellate authority with the Supreme Court of Justice of Guatemala. The latter is responsible for reviewing whether a lower court interpreted the law correctly. The Constitutional Court is responsible for deciding whether a law or state action was consistent with the Constitution. Its specific duties are:

• To hear challenges of laws on the grounds of partial or total unconstitutionality.
• To serve as an Extraordinary Tribunal of Amparo for challenges against the Congress, the Supreme Court of Justice, or the President or Vice-President.
• To hear appeals of writs of amparo from other courts.
• To hear appeals of challenges of laws on the grounds of constitutionality.
• To issue an advisory opinion on constitutionality of treaties, agreements, and bills of law.
• To hear and resolve conflicts of jurisdiction in the realm of constitutionality.
• To maintain a jurisprudential bulletin on resolved questions of constitutionality.
• To confirm or reject Executive vetoes alleging unconstitutionality.
• To render opinions on matters under its jurisdiction as defined by the Constitution.

The Court is composed of five titular magistrates, each of whom has a designated substitute. When the Court hears cases against the Supreme Court of Justice, the Congress, or the President or Vice-President two substitutes are drawn by lot to hear the case with the main five. Every five years a new set of magistrates are appointed along with new substitutes. Each of the following bodies appoints one set of magistrates: The Supreme Court of Justice, the Congress of the Republic, the President and the Council of Ministers, the Superior University council of the University of San Carlos de Guatemala, and the Assembly of the College of Attorneys and Notaries.^[2]

For the 2021-2026 term the Court is composed of the following members:^[3]

Magistrate		Role	Appointed By
	Dina Josefina Ochoa Escribá	Titular Magistrate	Congress of the Republic
	Luis Alfonso Rosales Marroquín	Substitute Magistrate	Congress of the Republic
	Héctor Hugo Pérez Aguilera	Titular Magistrate	Superior University council of the University of San Carlos
	Rony Eulalio López Contreras	Substitute Magistrate	Superior University council of the University of San Carlos
	Néster Mauricio Vásquez Pimentel	Titular Magistrate	Assembly of the College of Attorneys
	Claudia Elizabeth Paniagua Pérez	Substitute Magistrate	Assembly of the College of Attorneys
	Roberto Molina Barreto	Titular Magistrate	Supreme Court of Justice
	Walter Paulino Jiménez Texaj	Substitute Magistrate	Supreme Court of Justice
	Leyla Susana Lemus Arriaga	Titular Magistrate	President and the Council of Ministers
	Juan Jose Samayoa Villatoro	Substitute Magistrate	President and the Council of Ministers

The Constitutional Court, specifically the VI Magistracy, is best known internationally for overturning the conviction of Efraín Ríos Montt on charges of genocide.^[4] The Court ruled 3-2 that his trial did not proceed appropriately and ordered a new process. The majority found that the trial judges erred in expelling Ríos Montt's lawyer during the trial. The dissenting magistrates, Mauro Chacon and Gloria Porras, called the ruling disproportionate.^[5] A retrial was delayed by claims of inadequate health. This was the first time a nation tried a former leader domestically for genocide and thus drew significant scholarly and activist attention.