Racial hierarchy

The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (July 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A racial hierarchy is a system of stratification that is based on the belief that some racial groups are superior to other racial groups. At various points of history, racial hierarchies have featured in societies, often being formally instituted in law, such as in the Nuremberg Laws in Nazi Germany.^[1] Generally, those who support racial hierarchies believe themselves to be part of the 'superior' race and base their supposed superiority on pseudo-biological, cultural or religious arguments.^[2][3] However, systems of racial hierarchy have also been widely rejected and challenged, and many, such as Apartheid have been abolished.^[4] The abolition of such systems has not stopped debate around racial hierarchy and racism more broadly.

Liberia confers nationality solely on the basis of race. Under the current Liberian constitution, only persons of Black African origins (Negroes) may obtain citizenship, although Liberian law allows members of other races to hold permanent residency status.

Features of the first constitution that have been upheld include:

• Article V, Section 13 of the 1847 Constitution which states: "The great object of forming these Colonies, being to provide a home for the dispersed and oppressed children of Africa, and to regenerate and enlighten this benighted continent, none but persons of colour shall be eligible to citizenship in this Republic." The phrasing "persons of colour" was changed to "Negroes or persons of Negro descent" in a 1955 revision.

From the founding of the United States until after the Civil War, racial hierarchy was visible through the racially-based Slavery in the United States which had taken root before American independence. Though many abolitionists had campaigned for slavery to be ended, there was much resistance from those who benefitted economically, as well as those who believed it was 'natural' for racially based reasons-these two groups were not mutually exclusive. In order to maintain and defend slavery, pro-slavery writers organized a "planter liberalism" by combining paternalist and liberal views into an ideology that could be understood by both slave-holding and non-slave-holding citizens. Their ideology was based on familiar domestic relationships. These views later paved the way for white Southern planters to keep racial conditions as close to slavery as legally possible after the Civil War during the Reconstruction era.^[5]: 22

The Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished legal slavery in 1865, did not remove institutionalised racial hierarchy. In the southern states which had retained slavery until the end of the Civil War, states quickly moved to subjugate the freed slaves by introducing Black Codes, which were used to compel blacks to work for low wages and to control other aspects of their lives. Intellectual and civil rights activist W.E.B Du Bois wrote in 1935:

Slavery was not abolished even after the Thirteenth Amendment. There were four million freedmen and most of them on the same plantation, doing the same work they did before emancipation, except as their work had been interrupted and changed by the upheaval of war....They had been freed practically with no land nor money, and, save in exceptional cases, without legal status, and without protection'^[6]

As policies in the United States changed after the Reconstruction period, elements within the white population tried to continue their domination of the races they deemed inferior. Laws enacted after the 1880s prevented certain groups like Southern planters from continuing to affirm their mastery as black and white people became more legally equal. Southern Darwinian liberals wanted to provide little civil and political rights to blacks as a part of their mission to maintain white supremacy.^[5]: 104

Racial segregation, mandated by the Jim Crow laws, was a visible aspect of racial hierarchy in the United States until 1965. The system was justified by the concept of separate but equal from 1896, but was found to be unconstitutional by a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Warren, beginning with Brown vs Board of Education in 1954, which found that 'separate is not equal' in the realm of educational facilities.^[7]

In a study conducted by the Urban Institute, "black homebuyers encountered discrimination in 22 percent of their searches for rental units and 17 percent in their efforts to purchase homes. For Hispanics, the figures were 26 and 20 percent."^[8]: 10 African Americans and Hispanic people receive "inferior health care" compared to Caucasians when dealing with major health problems.^[8]: 11 A study conducted in 1995, showed that the infant mortality rate was higher for black babies than it was for white babies. The black rate was 14.3 for every 1000 babies as opposed to the 6.3 for every 1000 white babies.^[8]: 11 Some research has shown that it is easier for white people to find employment than black people despite the white person having a felony conviction.^[8]: 13

• The War Relocation Authority and The Incarceration of Japanese-American During World War II: 1942, Harry S. Truman Library & Museum.
• Gordon, Linda, and Gary Okihiro. Persons of Japanese Ancestry. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006.
• The Handbook of Texas Online. Accessed 2009-05-29.
• Herbert J. Gans. "The Possibility of a New Racial Hierarchy in the Twenty-first-century United States," in the Cultural Territories of Race: Black and White Boundaries, edited by Michele Lamont, pp. 371–79, 386–90. Copyright 1999 by the University of Chicago Press.
• Johnson, Allan G.. The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology: A User's Guide to Sociological Language. Malden: Blackwell Pub, 2000.
• Jacques, Martin. "The Global Hierarchy of Race." Common Dreams | News & Views. 13 Nov. 2008 <https://web.archive.org/web/20081011053448/http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0920-06.htm>.

• (2009) Rethinking the Color Line: Readings in Race and Ethnicity, 4/e. Charles A. Gallagher ISBN 0-07-340427-6
• (2004) From Jim Crow to racial hegemony: Evolving explanations of racial hierarchy, by Steven J. Gold. Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 27 No. 6 November 2004 pp. 951–968.

Discusses the nature of the racial hierarchy in the USA, contrasts the (black/white) bipolar model vs more complex ranking systems.

• (2003) The global hierarchy of race, by Martin Jacques.