Template talk:Politics of Peru

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Peru This template is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru WikiProject Peru To-do: edit history watch purge Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Peru national football team GAN: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate: National University of San Marcos Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention Politics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

I reverted to the old version. This is not the Spanish Wikipedia. Please keep it similar to the other infoboxes on politics in countries. (compare e.g. with Politics of Spain, Politics of Canada etc.) It is not clear while the other version is more accurate. It links to less information, and the article List of prime ministers of Peru is about the prime minister, not about the council of ministers. If somebody could make such an article, it would be nice. Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 08:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The previous version is much better, and I used the model from the Spanish Wikipedia since the quality and amount of articles is way more better (and impartial). I'm reverting it to that model. Any questions, feel fre to put this issue on vote. Messhermit 15:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it has less articles, it does not fit into the other templates and there was not made any argument why ypur model is more better and impartial. Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 15:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've been asked for my two cents. For one thing and this goes for both parties involved, please remember to be civil and avoid labels. Second, I am going to agree with Electionworld on this matter. If you look at any of the templates for other "Politics of XXXX" on English Wikipedia you see much more info than what was provided by your version of the template Messhermit. It is generally accepted that that is the format of templates on this subject.--Jersey Devil 19:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I've replaced the old one with the "politbox", looks better. Also I moved some links to some other pages. --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 04:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you have no tastes this template looks terrible —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.43.230.70 (talk) 00:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]