User talk:Democraticmacguitarist

Do not be scared by this page being empty; go ahead and leave comments for me below. Democraticmacguitarist

I don't see the items I listed in the other sections. They were not released as singles; they are not Roger Daltrey albums or soundtracks. I started to put them in "Singles" but decided it was inappropriate. If they're to be merged, where would you put them? Or is the consensus to leave them out? Pkeets (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to have to look at the edit history of the page to answer that question. I am not the one who made those edits. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history says the section was deleted because it duplicated info in the other tables. This is not true of the info I've added. Therefore the addition should be valid. Pkeets (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you for clearing that up for me. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 16:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

About this change: If you do not include the protocol name in the url (like //ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js) then the browser will take the protocol used to access this resource. With this web developers can avoid browser warning about non-ssl resources on a page accessed through https. This pattern is unfortunately not widespread, but what anon-user did in his/her change looks correct to me.

--K0zka (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Democraticmacguitarist:I noticed your revert of my edit. It may be stylized but the only place I've found where it is, is IMDb; all other sources, including the wiki article linked in Roger Daltrey discography don't use the stylized version. How about a footnote to that effect, if only to stop others making the same edit Jodosma (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given that your edit make the link go to a disambiguation page, I doubt it will be made again. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 20:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put a comment in the edit window instead. Jodosma (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Democraticmacguitarist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Democraticmacguitarist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]