User talk:DreamRimmer/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:DreamRimmer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Shan79 is adding content without sources and been doing vandalism to the article Bhagavanth Kesari. We have warned him. Can you please do anything? Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

DramRimmer, Hello , Cany you make copyediting for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling in Sachidanand Bharti, I made few changes last 18 days ago from our Alternative account and please marked as Reviewed this article if possible. Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

@Aviram7, I've just conducted a quick cleanup, and I couldn't spot any layout or other issues that need copy editing. So, I went ahead and removed those maintenance tags. Now, regarding your request to mark the page as reviewed, I wanted to let you know that it's already been taken care of. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 09:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

DreamRimmer, well and Thanks, You already know I daily rountinely edit to reduce Spam & Vandalism at regular basis and reviewing pending changes article on enwiki if needs, I sometimes edits when I see any mistake in article , Thanks for answering to me. Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Why did you delete my editing of the article about Fox Reynard, which mentioned the story of Ukrainian writer Ivan Franko? I provided the link as required by the rules, I don't understand how this link is not an authoritative source, it was published according to all the canons of scientific literature. Or maybe you just think that Ukrainian literature should not be represented in the global context? Князівна (talk) 08:59, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

@Князівна, Of course, Ukrainian literature sources are generally reliable. However, I found that source to be unreliable, so I undid your edit. If you believe that your edit was supported by a reliable source, please feel free to add it back. Happy editing! 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 10:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello DreamRimmer,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to हिन्दी और तुर्की on Meta. The page Wikimedia Foundation elections/2024/Announcement/Rules package review - closing is available for translation. You can translate it here:

• translate to हिन्दी
• translate to तुर्की

The priority of this page is medium.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Meta to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Meta translation coordinators‎, 01:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I Saw your revert edits and I grant you this barnaster for your excellence work ; I hope you clean wikipedia from Vandalism and Spam.Kind regards ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! -- 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 09:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

• Kristinak98 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Planforge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello DreamRimmer!

I have viewed, that you have declined my draft of the "Planforge" article. Please review the draft again, as it is an exact translation to the last version of the german article to "Planforge": https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planforge

(Except the rebranded developer name "Planforge GmbH" - it was not reviewed yet in the german article - it still says "ONEPOINT Projects GmbH" but I have already updated it in the german article, too, as this is not right anymore. Source: https://www.planforge.io/en/imprint)

Thus, I don't understand, how the draft could not be accepted, as the exact same german article I translated it from, already exists on wikipedia for a long time. Furthermore, as it is a translation, it would be wrong, if I now wrote it completely different than the german one, right?

Thank you and best regards

Kristinak98 (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello DreamRimmer:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1900 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given to DreamRimmer for collecting more than 7 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given to DreamRimmer for collecting more than 200 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

William Donald Nix, that's his real name. I don't have to prove I'm right on it, since he's my father's cousin and I know him very well, as you might suppose.William Donald "Don" Nix , and that's it. 95.23.33.32 (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 21:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

0xDeadbeef

Tamzin

Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

Pppery

• Ragesoss
• TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

• The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
• There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.

Arbitration

• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
• Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
• Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
• Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
• Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
• Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
• An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

• The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!

I am quite confused about your rejection of the draft Kunitama. It has 4 sources^[1][2][3][4] that definitely count as

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject

of which the bulk of the article cites from

And a few for specific claims related to local Kunitama.

And it is quite radically improved over the previous rejection which only had two sources^[1][3].

How did it not fit these criteria? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 03:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

@Immanuelle, I didn't come across significant coverage in the source you provided. The first source only had a brief paragraph about the topic, and I haven't found a source that delves into this topic in depth yet. If my explanation isn't meeting your needs, you might want to consider seeking advice from other reviewers at WP:AFC/H or WT:AFC. – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer, while I agree that the first source is not in-depth, it is an encyclopedia article. Having an entry in an encyclopedia is an extremely strong indicator of notability. Indeed there are many people who believe that wikipedia should have an article on every topic that is covered by another encyclopedia. -- asilvering (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I heard you needed a little WikiLove, so here you are :) Look forward to meeting you some day!

— MusikAnimal ^talk 16:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal, Thank you so much. I'm really looking forward to the day when my dream of meeting you will finally come true. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

what did i do wrong I81.117,13.122 (talk) 04:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, In your request , you didn't specify the category you want to create. Could you please provide the correct category name and share links to three or more articles for inclusion in that category? – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

For example, see this request. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

that makes sense ill do that thanks I81.117,13.122 (talk) 14:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

hey man quick question. how do i view the page source again? I81.117,13.122 (talk) 01:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

nevermind i think i got it I81.117,13.122 (talk) 01:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

wait im not quite ready to post it there just to get denied again do to an error i made. where do i practice? can i use my talk page? I81.117,13.122 (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

You can use WP:Sandbox for testing. – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

hey thanks for your help i really appreciate it. unfornitly i feel alseep at the computer and lost about everything. :( 50.109.190.44 (talk) 03:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

	The Civility Barnstar
	Dear DreamRimmer Hello, Thank for helping and advising me on off and on wikipedia!I have decided what to do now; We always will remain grateful to you. :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your tireless contributions to the New page patrol. Your efforts are immensely valued. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! Your work is truly impressive. I think you deserve a barnstar too. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Eagerly waiting to see your first article :) Thilsebatti (talk) 15:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, can you specific what the bug it is? Thanks a lot for testing my script. -Lemonaka‎ 08:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Lemonaka, I apologize for the delayed response as I completely forgot about this message. Firstly, thank you for the amazing script. The issue I encountered was when I used it to report a user. Initially, I chose TPA and then opted not to leave a warning on their talk, but the script left my signature on their talk page. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer Done, fixed. Due to some nasty reasons from functionaries, I'm banned from ANI, will you test it again if possible? -Lemonaka‎ 14:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Sure, if I find it useful, I will definitely use it and provide feedback. – DreamRimmer (talk) 02:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Administrator changes

• Ganesha811
• JPxG

• Ajpolino
• Lourdes
• Mairi
• RockMFR
• Somno
• WilyD

Beeblebrox → Just Step Sideways

CheckUser changes

• Beeblebrox
• Opabinia regalis

Oversight changes

• Beeblebrox
• Opabinia regalis

Guideline and policy news

• Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
• The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
• Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

Sir please review your recent edit Lukzdandg (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Would you be willing to help with merging the relevant contents from Khari River (Rajasthan) and Khari River, Rajasthan? I've redirected both pages in closing the RM, but I'm not totally sure how to merge the relevant content here coherently. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Sure, I'll merge it as soon as I have some free time. – DreamRimmer (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Done – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

TheUser:Fancy vibēs deleting history of Rajputs of Gujarat and Rajputs in Himachal Pradesh. The play with history of Rajput of Indian. Please take some action. Thank you 2409:408D:4D91:E477:796A:DF1A:433E:B92E (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

I am going to report your IP rage unfortunately you are pinging me everywhere since last three days and you are not here to contribute. Fancy vißes (call) 02:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

User:DreamRimmer Thank your very much for your action and changes in Thakur Hari Singh. I also request you to Please change the Ravana Rajputs article which contains some bad words like concubines and salves. There is not any concubines word in any refference of Ravana Rajputs. The refference in Ravana Rajputs were Colonial Era but during that time there were many people like Thakur Hari Singh and Dalpat Singh (soldier) who played main role in Rajasthan History. Please add notable people list in Ravana Rajputs which was removed by User:Fancy vibēs. Thank you❤🙏🙏🙏 2409:408D:1E8C:C068:9A10:6140:9F37:E3FF (talk) 16:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

I'm not well-versed in these topics, but I've been keeping an eye on this LTA for some time. They consistently attempt to insert incorrect and misleading information into articles about Indian castes, dynasties, Turkish dynasties, and Muslim dynasties and tribes. I'll continue watching these articles. Unfortunately, I don't have enough information about the page you mentioned, so if you think the last stable version was different, you can ask other experienced users on its talk page for help. – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

@DreamRimmer I saw your note on Draft:Bhati (clan) - is any of this the same incorrect or misleading info? Or have you not checked it yet and just wanted to flag it as a possible concern? -- asilvering (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

@Asilvering, recently, some LTAs have been consistently injecting a Gurjar perspective into articles about Indian and Muslim dynasties. Unfortunately, these LTAs have created several hoax articles about Gurjar clans by directly copying names and content from legitimate dynasties and clans. This specific article follows a the similar pattern, relying on the works of Gurjar writer Javaid Rahi as its sources. Please see Bhati, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bensebgli, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anuj Choudhary Ror – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 00:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Namaste 🙏 There is a Wikipedia article on Santadas Kathiababa but a Google search does not find the Wikipedia article. Work on improving this article bro. Santadas Kathiababa was a spiritual teacher, cleric and philosopher of the Nimbark community in India. Brother I request your help to improve the article. You correct and refine this article Killz Gough (talk) 06:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@Killz Gough, The page you're referring to hasn't been reviewed yet, which is why it isn't indexing in Google or any other search engine's results. Articles that haven't been reviewed aren't indexed by search engines for 90 days. After this period, the article remains in the NPP queue, but search engines can start indexing it. – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Improve this article bro. Correct the page needed. Killz Gough (talk) 11:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, DreamRimmer, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you now intend to spend more of your editing time writing about women. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our essays, perhaps starting with our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing! Thilsebatti (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

	This blanket . .
	hopefully makes you feel as warm as your monthly barnstars are! I know it's weird to give someone WikiLove just for giving barnstars to people, but thank you for making Wikipedia a nicer place. (Roundish ✡t) 23:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

(:– DreamRimmer (talk) 08:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A455bcd9 -- A455bcd9 (talk) 11:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

The article Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit and Talk:Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A455bcd9 -- A455bcd9 (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

The article Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit for comments about the article, and Talk:Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A455bcd9 -- A455bcd9 (talk) 16:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi DreamRimmer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you posted a copyright violation tag on the article Calleigh Duquesne earlier today. However, I think the copyright violation went the other way. The website with the very similar content was created sometime during July 2007, with content that had been already on Wikipedia for a while at that point. Tvx1 23:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

@Tvx1, I couldn't find information on whether Wikipedia or the website published the content first. That's why I added a tag, as cases without clear copyright licensing information and publishing dates should be treated as possible copyright violation. I wasn't certain about the violation, so I just tagged it with a non-free tag. In cases where I am sure, I follow the cleanup-revdel or G12 processes. An AfDed article should be marked as reviewed to remove it from the NPP queue. I was unsure, so I only tagged it, thinking someone with more information could take appropriate action. By the way, how do you know that the content was first posted on Wikipedia and later on that site in July 2007? – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Is not that difficult to find a tool to check a website’s age. Using one I found that the website was created during July 2007 and the edit history of our article already shows the disputed content by May of that year. Tvx1 12:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

In my opinion, relying on information from random websites might not be the best idea. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi I have attempted to create my first article Kadak Singh. This is a Hindi film featuring very prominent actors, including national award winners and has been directed by an acclaimed filmmaker. Looking forward to your feedback and an approval.

Regards Filmy World (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Done. The film appears to pass WP:NFF, so I have marked it as reviewed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Much to learn. Thanks a bunch! Filmy World (talk) 16:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Re: the name, Velcheru Narayana Rao, on my page, Nidadavolu Malathi as his spouse. Yesterday, in response to your message stating, I violated some rule, I have responded why I wanted it removed. Once again, I suggest my name on his page is not uncalled for. It gives the falls impression that tw two are still couple. Also, just now I noticed that my name is not mentioned on his page, apparently, for the same reason--there is no relationship. I hate to mention it, but there may be some bias here. Thanks for the opportunity to explain myself.

Regard, Malathi Malathi Nidadavolu (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

On 5 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit once advocated for a "right to vote from birth"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lore Maria Peschel-Gutzeit), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear DreamRimmer, Hello I'm currently working of our 1st article on wikipedia whose name Draft:Bhagabhai Dhanabhai Barad, can you help me to make a better article if you feel comfortable? Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

@Aviram7, It looks good. Once you move it to mainspace, I'll tidy up the grammar and make some fixes. By the way, how many people are editing from your account? – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear DreamRimmer, I think if my article will be accepted through WP:AFC process and I want to work in WP:AFC process, it will be good for me, @Aviram7 is only my account and only I edit from our account, but why you are asking this question? Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

You mentioned, 'I'm currently working on our first Wikipedia article titled Draft:Bhagabhai Dhanabhai Barad,' which is why I asked about your account usage. No problem if you prefer AfC. I'm fixing your draft as you asked. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

I submitted from review, I'm waiting a time when My draft are accepted by other afc reviewers. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

I was about to save my changes but noticed someone had already fixed the grammar and accepted it. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear DreamRimmer, Thank you I have decided to make more article releated to Indian politicians, and tommarrow I was one more article created but they not currently accepted yet by another Afc reviewers, I only prefer WP:AFC because this good for article.

If you feel comfortable,so, can you accept my draft submission my humble request you to. Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Done. Good work on this one, keep it up! – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear DreamRimmer, Hello, Sorry for intrupt you, can you accepted Draft:Pratap Singh Singhvi at this time .Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Done – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Dear, Can you give me feedback above my article and my work, I think you fully examined my contributions, so you give feedback if feel comfortable. Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear DreamRimmer, Hello, Can you took look at this Draft:Dharmraj Singh Yadav and Can you accepted this draft? I'm Very struggling to make more articles releated to Indian politicians,I've created at least 30 + article releated to Indian politicians, and Thank you for rectifying grammatically. please help us. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Done. Good work on this one, keep it up! – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 02:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear DreamRimmer,Hello,plesae restore old reference in the Bhajan Lal Sharma because those reference was the evidence of his notability and my old reference are clearly indicates this subject's notability.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:48, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

It's concerning to see this kind of message from an NPP. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

So I'm sorry, but I just want to know why all the old references and content were removed from the article that I provided at the time of creating the page, I don't think anyone should be able to remove more of the content from those old versions. Has been removed, removing information from the page without any reason also comes under the category of vandalism, if you want, after the last time you edited this page, see what edits other people have done while updating the pages. did?:( ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @HJ Mitchell, I've assumed good faith many times, but now, seeing these types of messages and responses, I doubt your understanding of related policies. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

I think, thank you for pinging @HJ Mitchell for about that, on wikipedia my contributions are useless in your eyes , perhaps, I just came to ask you a question to you, yes, I made a mistake unknowingly but not misused the rights, however I consider it in my best interest to leave here, although I will have nothing to do with it.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)±

No one told you to leave Wikipedia. I saw your request on an admin's talk page about protecting Bhajan Lal Sharma because he's now the Chief Minister of Rajasthan. You really want to keep it protected because lots of users are making changes, but honestly, I haven't seen any vandalism there. Just a reminder, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia open for everyone to edit. And remember, creating a page doesn't mean it's yours – it's always changing, especially when it's about current events. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Also, note that I haven't accused you of misusing your rights, but I am concerned about repeated instances of poor judgment and limited knowledge of policies. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

I know Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit, I requested to protect that page later, but someone else had already requested to protect it on the security page, so I Have created a page, but anyone can make changes in the article, I have no problem with it nor will I, I am happy that the person on whom the article has been created is now going to serve as the Chief Minister of Rajasthan, I made a mistake. Asking you questions on this topic, but it would be better for me to leave from here, please forgive me, but I have seen minor vandalism on that article recently, I know that it takes hard work of an editor to create an article. And it also takes a lot of time, the only reason was that considering you a good friend, your members had come for the talks, but now it is better for me to go.

I have only a limited understanding of the correct policies, if I continue to contribute in the future, I will definitely try to learn a lot from more experienced Wikipedians than myself, thanks for mentioning my error here. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)