User talk:Nathan B2/Archive 2023

Hi Nathan, I saw your edit on the William Lane Craig page, we had been discussing that reference on the talk page where I discussed its methodology and language. Wanted to check in with you to see if I had missed a concern. Thanks, Squatch347 (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to The Church On The Way. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan B2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Calvary Temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello would you so kind as to add Global University in Canada (globaluniversity.ca) to your list of Christian colleges and Universities in Canada? Suuport globaluniversity.ca (talk) 19:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelical megachurches in New Zealand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Graeme Lee (politician)

added a link pointing to American

Summit cross

added a link pointing to Hollywood

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Life Church (Canada), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently edited a page related to climate change, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi! this is a warning you are required to receive by wikipedia when you edit in a contentious topic area, In this case that happened on Katharine Hayhoe. As explained above, you need to be extra careful in these areas of the wiki, because to put it simply the moderators are a bit more banhappy than normal due to past or current controversies and a history of bad behaviour from people who edit there.--Licks-rocks (talk) 15:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acadia University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alliance World Fellowship

added links pointing to New York and Fourfold Gospel

Billy Graham

added a link pointing to Wheaton College

Hendrick Health System

added a link pointing to Gallup

Tim Scott

added a link pointing to Charleston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nathan. I see you have done some good work on updates for many church groups. Thanks for your work on that. I did notice that on June 7 you had moved Charis Fellowship to the Charis Alliance page. If I can be of help to correct information I am happy to. Charis Fellowship is actually it's own distinct entity. As an association of churches in the USA/Canada, we are also members of our broader global family Charis Alliance, but there is still seperate distinction. I mention this as I also did not see any reference to the Charis Fellowship website www.charisfellowship.com which has what may be some updated helpful information. There are other updates and adjustments to make beyond that, and I may look into editing the pages in the coming months myself, but thought I would reach out to you first. I am the coordinator for Charis Fellowship and can be contacted through the contact page of our website if needed. Thanks! Tim H 50.32.83.8 (talk) 18:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tim H 50.32.83.8 (talk · contribs). Thank you for the message. Nice to meet you. I answered on Talk:Charis Alliance#Improvements. Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (Wikipedia:WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Anupam. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ordination of women in Christianity without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anupam^Talk 01:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam (talk · contribs). The information about denominations that do not, have been removed (off topic and useless). References have been added for favorable denominations. Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (Wikipedia:WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 01:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated WP:BRD and WP:3RR. You have removed a mass quantity of information from the article without obtaining consensus on the talk page, even though I asked you to do that. Please self-revert now, or I will file a report and you will be blocked for your tendentious edit warring. Anupam^Talk 02:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam (talk · contribs). Thank you for the message. The historic shows that you made 3 reverts first. Explanations have been given in the talk pages. The removed content is about denominations that do not (off topic and useless) and duplicates (example: each line says the same thing has been replaced by a title consistent with the main subject : Christian denominations that ordain women). Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (Wikipedia:WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan B2. Thank you for your work on Union of Baptist Churches of Benin. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan B2. Thank you for your work on National Baptist Convention of Venezuela. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nathan B2. I've just seen that you have edited the page College of Leadership and Theology. What I'm wondering about is it you have any sources of why you changed the name of the page to "College of Leadership and Theology" instead of "Norwegian School of Leadership and Theology". Looking at the colleges English website the name seem to be "Norwegian School of Leadership and Theology". Do you have any information that says otherwise? Kindest regards BigWat (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BigWat (talk · contribs). Thank you for the message. The article was renamed to College of Leadership and Theology on March 18, 2023, in an effort to provide a better translation of the school's name (Norwegian: Høyskolen for Ledelse og Teologi). Indeed, the word “Høyskolen” refers more to a college (higher education) in Norwegian, as demonstrated by this category (https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategori:H%C3%B8yskoler_i_Norge). The English-speaking website is not given on the Norwegian official website and was added on the Norwegian wiki article only on April 17, 2023 (one month later). With the reference mentioned of the English-speaking website, it's a good thing to have renamed the title to Norwegian School of Leadership and Theology. Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (Wikipedia:WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Baptist deacon to Category:Baptist deacons Hugo999 (talk) 03:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page March for Jesus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

First African Baptist Church (Richmond, Virginia)

added a link pointing to Church

Second Baptist Church (Los Angeles)

added a link pointing to Church

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former Southern Baptist ministers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Global Mission has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11 § Global Mission until a consensus is reached. older ≠ wiser 15:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan B2,

I'm here to drop a note about Category:Sexual abuse scandals in Charismatic Christianity and Category:Scandals in Charismatic Christianity. Category redirects are created differently than article redirects. Please look at the code/template on these pages so you understand how to create category redirects should you wish to create more in the future. Thanks for all of your contributions to the project!Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nathan B2

Greetings @Nathan B2

Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across some of your contributions .

Requesting your visit to Draft:Re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia - draft article mainly intends to focus on academic and may be some intellectual discourse in the media about remosqueing of Hagia Sophia.

Since last one year there is more academic literature on the topic which seem to need coverage hence requesting your help expand the topic areas if you find the topic interesting. Wish you very happy Wikipedia editing.

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 07:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CTS is looking for an editor… we could use your skills. Gocovenant.com dr will Ryan 72.135.50.161 (talk) 13:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have changed "Christian denomination" to "association of churches" on hundreds of articles without any consensus. Changes like this require community-wide consensus. Do not make the change again without starting a community-wide discussion. I, for one, oppose these kinds of changes as the majority of the subjects do indeed consider themselves a denomination and are classed that way by scholars, e.g. the American Baptist Churches USA. Per WP:BRD, I have reversed most of your changes, which must must must be discussed. desmay (talk) 22:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Desmay (talk · contribs). Thank you for the message. Changes were made to these articles (a large part of which I wrote (outside North America and outside Europe)), in order to be more precise about the nature of these church groups. The term “denominations” to refer to a group of churches is rather American (United States) (Wikipedia:Systemic bias). In other countries, this concerns more a Christian branch (e.g. Baptist Christianity). It is therefore not the most appropriate to refer to these churches, due to the theological autonomy of the churches (Congregationalist polity) and free association. Indeed, in Baptist Christianity and also in certain evangelical movements (Candy Gunther Brown, Mark Silk, The Future of Evangelicalism in America, Columbia University Press, USA, 2016, p. 205-207), the vast majority of church associations are considered to be church associations, by themselves (this can be visible in the name) and by the scholars also (William H. Brackney, Historical Dictionary of the Baptists, Scarecrow Press, 2009, p. 38-40 ; C. Douglas Weaver, In Search of the New Testament Church: The Baptist Story, Mercer University Press, 2008, p. 26 ;Stephen R. Holmes, Baptist Theology, T&T Clark, 2012, p. 104-105). The article Association of churches is also interesting to read. You did well to raise this question, these details have been added in the Baptists#Baptist_organizations section! Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (Wikipedia:WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 15:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christian denomination is not just used in the United States, but globally. Regardless of your opinion, community-wide consensus is needed. I still remain steadfast in opposing your changes. Some Baptist churches are independent while most are grouped into denominations. desmay (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions. I appreciate your efforts in seeking information that is true and representative of reality. My approach is the same. A-Regarding, the American Baptist Churches USA, you are right. But the introduction reminds us that there are evangelical orientations in this association. This association is a member of the Baptist World Alliance, which considers itself evangelical. So, it's fair to say that a member of an evangelical association can be identified as evangelical. However, I haven't changed anything on this subject in this article and that was not the aim of the modifications... B-Regarding the use of the word associations to talk about these groups, either the aim of the modifications of good faith. The term denomination is well used (examples: by general books about religion or Christianity) to talk about these groups of churches. This is not bad in itself. However, a large part of the websites of these associations and many wiki articles have used the term association consensually for many years:

Example 1: Nagaland Baptist Church Council : 2013‎ [1]- 2018 [2]). Example 2: Baptist Convention of Hong Kong : 2008‎ [3]- 2019 [4]). Example 3: Myanmar Baptist Convention :2003[5]- 2018 [6]). Example 4: Canadian Baptist Ministries :2003[7]]- 2013 [[8]. Example 5: North American Baptist Conference :2003[9]- 2022 [10]. Example 6: Baptist Churches of New Zealand :2003[11]- 2019 [12]. Example 7: Baptists Together :2003[13]- 2020 [14]).

And this is what led me to do further research to find that they were right. Indeed, scholars specializing in the study of Baptist Christianity and certain evangelical movements have demonstrated that the word association of churches is more representative when speaking of these groups. I added the citations in the references. I'm glad to have spoken with you, your questions helped improve my explanations on the subject. I am confident that we will find a peaceful solution together. A Merry Christmas in advance! Thanks for your help. My best wishes of peace and love (Wikipedia:WikiLove).--Nathan B2 (talk) 15:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]