Share to:

 

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Kingdom

Requested move of Apache Indian

An editor has requested that Apache Indian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) be moved to another page, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Titles in infoboxes

See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#Sir and Dame in the name line of Infobox person. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § History of Great Britain by period, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Ham II (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2024 United Kingdom riots#Requested move 7 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 03:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales § Cadw's renaming of castles. On how to recognise the recent adoption of Welsh names in English for castles in Wales. DankJae 19:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:South Asian Muslim grooming gang panic#Requested move 16 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Laura Robson

Laura Robson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for British people

British people has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for British Airways

British Airways has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Dinner by Heston Blumenthal

Dinner by Heston Blumenthal has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muslim grooming gangs in the United Kingdom#Requested move 3 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 03:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of landlord Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for England

England has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject United Kingdom:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 12:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Godric#Requested move 12 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 17:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Task-force conversion proposal

The American, Canadian, Australian, and Japanese music industries all have their own task forces within their respective WikiProjects (with Latin music its own project entirely). Combine that with the defunct status of WP:WikiProject Music of the United Kingdom, and this leaves the door open for a revival as a more manageable task force. Anyone up for the task? (Symphony No. 2 in E minor, a recent WP:AFC graduate, brought me here.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Forestry in the United Kingdom

Forestry in the United Kingdom has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Danny Cohen (television executive)#Requested move 11 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The above category, Category:Political parties of minorities in United Kingdom, was created in recent months. And populated with, to my understanding at least, more than a few UK-based political parties that do not appear to be parties which represent minority groups. Along with a few other editors, I have reverted some of these changes - as neither the text nor the references of the articles appear to support the classifications. Or refer to the subjects as parties which represent minority groups. As would be expected by WP:CATV and WP:CATDEF. Including, for example, removing the category from the articles on the Northern Independence Party, Scottish Family Party, Scottish Senior Citizens Unity Party, Women's Equality Party, etc. Or the classification, without explanation or support, the Liverpool Catholic Party and the Liverpool Protestant Party as both being representative of minority groups. Contributors to this WikiProject, who are perhaps more familiar with political parties in the UK (including, perhaps, conventions on groups representing "national minorities" in the UK), might wish to review some of the other entries in that category. Including, perhaps, the classification of the "Highland Land League" as an example of "Political parties of minorities in United Kingdom". Such classification seemingly being based entirely on the basis that "Gaelic speakers were a minority and still are". (Attempts to engage the involved editor, to explain or perhaps even reconsider some of these classifications, haven't been entirely fruitful. Hence the suggestion that members of this WikiProject perhaps, impartially and with more knowledge than I, consider taking a look...). If I've overstepped and, for example, there is justification or sources such that Women or feminists Scottish pensioners should be considered minority groups in the UK, please do feel free to revert my own changes.... Guliolopez (talk) 11:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Matt Byrne

Matt Byrne has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for The Nightmare

The Nightmare has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Food waste in the United Kingdom

Food waste in the United Kingdom has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Concorde

Concorde has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Crown Office#Requested move 28 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Public school (England)#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 18:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for R v R

R v R has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Batman in film

Batman in film has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UK Terminally Ill Adults Bills

 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see Talk:Assisted suicide in the United Kingdom#UK Terminally Ill Adults Bills. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Angevin kings of England

Angevin kings of England has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Borsoka (talk) 02:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Postnominal letters and infoboxes

See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#MOS:POSTNOM for discussion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: Rating of the 2005 Birmingham tornado

There is an ongoing RFC to determine which source should be used for the rating of the 2005 Birmingham tornado. You can participate in the discussion here: Talk:2005 Birmingham tornado#Should the article’s infobox indicate EF2/T4 or F3/T5-6?. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:25, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Lobster (magazine)

Lobster (magazine) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya