Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
Friends of the Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport), [1992] 1 SCR 3 [1]
|
February 19, 20, 1991
|
January 23, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Bain, [1992] 1 SCR 91 [2]
|
|
January 23, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Lohnes, [1992] 1 SCR 167 [3]
|
November 1, 1991
|
January 23, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. (M.E.) v. L. (P.), [1992] 1 SCR 183 [4]
|
October 2, 1991
|
January 23, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference re Manitoba Language Rights, [1992] 1 SCR 212 [5]
|
October 8, 1991
|
January 23, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 SCR 236 [6]
|
October 11, 1991
|
January 23, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Morin, [1992] 3 SCR 286 [7]
|
January 30, 1992
|
January 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. (K.N.) v. P. (G.R.), [1992] 1 SCR 210 [8]
|
February 5, 1992
|
February 5, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Généreux, [1992] 1 SCR 259 [9]
|
June 5, 1991
|
February 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Forster, [1992] 1 SCR 339 [10]
|
June 5, 1991
|
February 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur, [1992] 1 SCR 351 [11]
|
October 3, 1991
|
February 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lapointe v. Hôpital Le Gardeur, [1992] 1 SCR 382 [12]
|
|
February 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomson v. Canada (Deputy Minister of Agriculture), [1992] 1 SCR 385 [13]
|
October 28, 1991
|
February 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Québec (Communauté urbaine) v. Services de santé du Québec, [1992] 1 SCR 426 [14]
|
December 5, 1991
|
February 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Underwriters Assn. of Canada v. Provincial Assn. of Quebec Life Underwriters, [1992] 1 SCR 449 [15]
|
February 26, 1992
|
February 26, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 SCR 452 [16]
|
|
February 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Wise, [1992] 1 SCR 527 [17]
|
June 25, 1991
|
February 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sinclair v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1992] 1 SCR 579 [18]
|
October 9, 1991
|
February 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Clunas, [1992] 1 SCR 595 [19]
|
November 12, 1991
|
February 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Green, [1992] 1 SCR 614 [20]
|
February 7, 1992
|
February 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Moore, [1992] 1 SCR 619 [21]
|
February 28, 1992
|
February 28, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quebec (Attorney General) v. Transport G. Courchesne Inc., [1992] 1 SCR 621 [22]
|
February 28, 1992
|
February 28, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lefebvre v. HOJ Industries Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 831 [23]
|
March 2, 1992
|
March 2, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newfoundland Telephone Co. v. Newfoundland (Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities), [1992] 1 SCR 623 [24]
|
November 7, 1991
|
March 5, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frenette v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., [1992] 1 SCR 647 [25]
|
November 6, 1991
|
March 12, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Milne, [1992] 1 SCR 697 [26]
|
November 4, 1991
|
March 26, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v. Chiarelli, [1992] 1 SCR 711 [27]
|
October 28, 1991
|
March 26, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. T. (V.), [1992] 1 SCR 749 [28]
|
January 29, 1992
|
March 26, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 SCR 771 [29]
|
October 1, 1991
|
March 26, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Sharma, [1992] 1 SCR 814 [30]
|
October 1, 1991
|
March 26, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
R. v. Duncanson, [1992] 1 SCR 836 [31]
|
March 30, 1992
|
March 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Martin, [1992] 1 SCR 838 [32]
|
March 30, 1992
|
March 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Ellis-Don Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 840 [33]
|
March 31, 1992
|
March 31, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. CIP Inc., [1992] 1 SCR 843 [34]
|
June 27, 1991
|
April 9, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference re Milgaard (Can.), [1992] 1 SCR 866 [35]
|
January 16, 21‑24, February 17‑20, March 4, 9‑12, April 6, 1992
|
April 14, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Williams v. Canada, [1992] 1 SCR 877 [36]
|
October 10, 1991
|
April 16, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1992] 1 SCR 901 [37]
|
December 3, 1991
|
April 16, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tremblay v. Quebec (Commission des affaires sociales), [1992] 1 SCR 952 [38]
|
February 27, 1992
|
April 16, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Van Haarlem, [1992] 1 SCR 982 [39]
|
April 27, 1992
|
April 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. M. (W.H.), [1992] 1 SCR 984 [40]
|
April 27, 1992
|
April 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Pasini, [1992] 1 SCR 1017 [41]
|
April 29, 1992
|
April 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd., [1992] 1 SCR 986 [42]
|
March 2, 1992
|
April 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Neverson, [1992] 1 SCR 1014 [43]
|
April 30, 1992
|
April 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co., [1992] 1 SCR 1021 [44]
|
May 2, 1991
|
April 30, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Canadian Commercial Bank, [1992] 2 SCR 3 [45]
|
May 6, 1992
|
May 6, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
Bovey v. Gananoque (Town), [1992] 2 SCR 5 [46]
|
May 6, 1992
|
May 6, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1992] 2 SCR 7 [47]
|
May 7, 1992
|
May 7, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re Canada Labour Code, [1992] 2 SCR 50 [48]
|
December 11, 1991
|
May 21, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Downey, [1992] 2 SCR 10 [49]
|
November 1, 1991
|
May 21, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. D. (S.), [1992] 2 SCR 161 [50]
|
June 4, 1992
|
June 4, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Murdock, [1992] 2 SCR 164 [51]
|
June 4, 1992
|
June 4, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference re Milgaard (Can.), [1992] 1 SCR 875 [52]
|
February 3, 1992
|
June 4, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. J. (M.A.), [1992] 2 SCR 166 [53]
|
June 5, 1992
|
June 5, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Bennett, [1992] 2 SCR 168 [54]
|
June 5, 1992
|
June 5, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strang v. Strang, [1992] 2 SCR 112 [55]
|
April 1, 1992
|
June 11, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. W. (R.), [1992] 2 SCR 122 [56]
|
April 2, 1992
|
June 11, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McInerney v. MacDonald, [1992] 2 SCR 138 [57]
|
February 5, 1992
|
June 11, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Kelly, [1992] 2 SCR 170 [58]
|
October 31, 1991
|
June 11, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Arnold, [1992] 2 SCR 208 [59]
|
November 8, 1991
|
June 11, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Guthrie, [1992] 2 SCR 222 [60]
|
June 16, 1992
|
June 16, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
Norberg v. Wynrib, [1992] 2 SCR 226 [61]
|
June 19, 1991
|
June 18, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zurich Insurance Co. v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), [1992] 2 SCR 321 [62]
|
November 5, 1991
|
June 25, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chrysler Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Competition Tribunal), [1992] 2 SCR 394 [63]
|
January 31, 1992
|
June 25, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference re Goods and Services Tax, [1992] 2 SCR 445 [64]
|
February 24, 25, 1992
|
June 25, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garcia Transport Ltée v. Royal Trust Co., [1992] 2 SCR 499 [65]
|
February 25, 1992
|
June 25, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of Montreal v. Bail Ltée, [1992] 2 SCR 554 [66]
|
March 6, 1992
|
June 25, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society, [1992] 2 SCR 606 [67]
|
December 4, 1991
|
July 9, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Deruelle, [1992] 2 SCR 663 [68]
|
May 1, 1992
|
July 9, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schachter v. Canada, [1992] 2 SCR 679 [69]
|
December 12, 1991
|
July 9, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Zundel, [1992] 2 SCR 731 [70]
|
December 10, 1991
|
August 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Barbeau, [1992] 2 SCR 845 [71]
|
April 30, 1992
|
August 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Sims, [1992] 2 SCR 858 [72]
|
June 15, 1992
|
August 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Parks, [1992] 2 SCR 871 [73]
|
January 27 1992
|
August 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Smith, [1992] 2 SCR 915 [74]
|
June 15, 1992
|
August 27, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pax Management Ltd. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [1992] 2 SCR 998 [75]
|
March 26, 1992
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
R. v. Z. (D.A.), [1992] 2 SCR 1025 [76]
|
April 28, 1992 rehearing: June 9, 1992
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vidéotron Ltée v. Industries Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 SCR 1065 [77]
|
March 26, 1992
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dickason v. University of Alberta, [1992] 2 SCR 1103 [78]
|
May 5, 1992
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norberg v. Wynrib, [1992] 2 SCR 318 [79]
|
September 24, 1992
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. DeSousa, [1992] 2 SCR 944 [80]
|
December 13, 1991
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Okanagan School District No. 23 v. Renaud, [1992] 2 SCR 970 [81]
|
March 24, 1992
|
September 24, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Rube, [1992] 3 SCR 159 [82]
|
October 9, 1992
|
October 9, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Ewert, [1992] 3 SCR 161 [83]
|
October 14, 1992
|
October 14, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haig v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), [1992] 3 SCR 163 [84]
|
October 22, 1992
|
October 22, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.(K.) v. M.(H.), [1992] 3 SCR 6 [85]
|
November 8, 1991
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brissette Estate v. Westbury Life Insurance Co.; Brissette Estate v. Crown Life Insurance Co., [1992] 3 SCR 87 [86]
|
February 27, 1992
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., [1992] 3 SCR 120 [87]
|
March 27, 1992
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeside Colony of Hutterian Brethren v. Hofer, [1992] 3 SCR 165 [88]
|
May 5, 1992
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelvin Energy Ltd. v. Lee, [1992] 3 SCR 235 [89]
|
May 27, 1992
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lalonde v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, [1992] 3 SCR 261 [90]
|
May 27, 1992
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
London Drugs Ltd. v. Kuehne & Nagel International Ltd., [1992] 3 SCR 299 [91]
|
October 29, 1991
|
October 29, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Hawkins, [1992] 3 SCR 463 [92]
|
November 2, 1992
|
November 2, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Atkinson, [1992] 3 SCR 465 [93]
|
November 2, 1992
|
November 2, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Babinski, [1992] 3 SCR 467 [94]
|
November 4, 1992
|
November 4, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Lebeau, [1992] 3 SCR 469 [95]
|
November 6, 1992
|
November 6, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. N. (C.), [1992] 3 SCR 471 [96]
|
November 13, 1992
|
November 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Comeau, [1992] 3 SCR 473 [97]
|
November 13, 1992
|
November 13, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Ontario, [1992] 3 SCR 762 [98]
|
June 2, 1992
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McVey (Re); McVey v. United States of America, [1992] 3 SCR 475 [99]
|
October 30, 1991
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Canadian Commercial Bank, [1992] 3 SCR 558 [100]
|
April 2, 1992
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Mellenthin, [1992] 3 SCR 615 [101]
|
May 29, 1992
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idziak v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [1992] 3 SCR 631 [102]
|
May 25, 1992
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Pearson, [1992] 3 SCR 665 [103]
|
May 28, 1992
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Morales, [1992] 3 SCR 711 [104]
|
May 28, 1992
|
November 19, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. Kearney, [1992] 3 SCR 807 [105]
|
December 1, 1992
|
December 1, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case name
|
Argued
|
Decided
|
Lamer
|
La Forest
|
L'Heureux-Dubé
|
Sopinka
|
Gonthier
|
Cory
|
McLachlin
|
Stevenson
|
Iacobucci
|
Major
|
R. v. Sawyer, [1992] 3 SCR 809 [106]
|
December 2, 1992
|
December 2, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. v. W. (B. A.), [1992] 3 SCR 811 [107]
|
December 4, 1992
|
December 4, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 SCR 813 [108]
|
April 1, 1992
|
December 17, 1992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|