This article is missing information about background on other (especially non-tech) overwork cultures in China; legitimized "special work hour" system in Shenzhen. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page.(July 2021)
The 996 working hour system (Chinese: 996工作制) is a work schedule practiced illegally by some companies in China. It derives its name from its requirement that employees work from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm, 6 days per week; i.e. 72 hours per week, 12 hours per day.[1][2][3][4][5][6] A number of Mainland Chinese internet and tech companies have adopted this system as their official or de-facto work schedule. Critics argue that the 996 working hour system is a violation of the Labour Law of the People's Republic of China and have called it "modern slavery".[7][8]
In March 2019, an "anti-996" protest was launched via GitHub.[9][10][11] Since then, the 996 issue has been met with growing discontent in China.[12][13][14]
The culture of overtime work has a long history in Chinese IT companies,[15] where the focus is typically on speed and cost reduction.[16] Companies employ a range of measures, such as reimbursing taxi fares for employees who remain working at the office late into the night, to incentivize overtime work.[17]
In 2020, a study published in IEEE Software done by Chinese researchers found that "Chinese businesses are more likely to follow long work hours than American ones".[24] Another study likened 996 culture to "modern slavery", formed through the combination of "unrestricted global capitalism and a Confucian culture of hierarchy and obedience".[7]
Companies involved
58.com
In September 2016, the classified advertising website 58.com officially declared its adoption of the 996 working hour system,[25] attracting criticism from employees and social commentators. The company responded that the 996 system would be an encouraged, not compulsory, practice.[26][27]
ByteDance
A CNBC article in May 2021 reported that workers at TikTok's parent company ByteDance were unhappy with the 996 work culture there and that people were turning down job opportunities at TikTok because of it.[28] In November 2021, ByteDance moved away from 996 and mandated shorter working hours.[29] Nevertheless, on 23 February 2022, the sudden death was reported of a 28-year-old employee at ByteDance, after he posted a message on Maimai [zh], a career and social networking platform, the night before. ByteDance later issued a statement that was shared in an internal letter with its staff in China, according to which the employee felt dizzy after an hour of exercise at the company gym, before he was taken to the hospital. The incident raised scrutiny of the frequent overtime demands of Chinese tech companies.[30]
JD.com
After 58.com's 996 schedule was made known to the public, an internal email from the vice-president Gang He (Chinese: 何剛) of JD.com was leaked online, which contained a demand for the management team of JD.com to implement the 996 working hour system "on a flexible basis".[31]
On 15 March 2019, an employee of JD.com alleged that some departments have begun implementing the 995 schedule (9 a.m. - 9 p.m., but five days per week), while other departments have already finished doing so. Following the report, the public relations department of JD.com announced that overtime work was not compulsory.[32]
Richard Liu, the founder of the company, said that the reason for his company's layoffs is because there's too many "slackers" and they are not his "brothers".[33] He said JD did not force its staff to work the "996" or even a "995" overtime schedule,
"But every person must have the desire to push oneself to the limit!".
Pinduoduo
In early January 2021, the e-commerce platform Pinduoduo was accused of forcing its employees to do extremely intensive overtimes, which supposedly led to the karoshi death of a 22-year-old worker.[34][35] Later, the official account of Pinduoduo posted (but deleted shortly afterwards) an answer on Zhihu, saying "Those who are at the bottom of the society earn their wages at the risk of losing their lives".[36]
Just a few days after the early January accident, another employee committed suicide by jumping.[37][38] On 10 January, news sources reported that Pinduoduo fired an employee who posted photos showing his colleague being carried into an ambulance.[39][40]
Youzan
In January 2019, an employee of Youzan stated on the social platform Maimai that their supervisor had enforced the 996 schedule.[41] Bai Ya, the CEO of Youzan, replied, "it would be a good thing to look back at a few years later".[17] Some media outlets criticized this schedule.[42] Later that month, the Labour Supervision Group of Xihu District, Hangzhou announced that the company was under investigation.[43]
Others
At least 40 companies, including Huawei and Alibaba Group, have implemented the 996 schedule or an even more intensive alternative.[44][45]
Online protests
996.ICU GitHub campaign
On 26 March 2019, the 996.ICU repository and website were created. The repository on GitHub states that the name "996.icu" refers to how developers who work under the 996 system (9 a.m. - 9 p.m., six days per week) would risk poor health and a possible stay in an intensive care unit. The movement's slogan is "developers' lives matter".[46][47][48][49][50][51][52]
Two days later, on 28 March 2019, the repository had already received 50 thousand stars, and 100 thousand stars on 30 March 2019, which made it the top trending repository on GitHub.[53] The repository reached 120 thousand stars on 31 March 2019, and 200 thousand stars on 9 April 2019, making it the second most starred repository on GitHub. The flurry of activity led to the "issue" page of the repository to be flooded with spam and shut down, which was hotly discussed on Zhihu, Sina Weibo, and WeChat.[1][54]
The original aim of the repository was to list the companies that use the 996 working hour system, but it soon developed into a movement; the Anti 996 Licence [zh] was created to explicitly prohibit companies using the 996 system from using open source[a] code licensed under it.[55][56]
On 2 April 2019, it was widely reported that Tencent's QQ browser and WeChat, Alibaba's UC Browser, Qihoo 360's 360 Browser, and many other browsers developed by companies in mainland China blocked the 996.icu repository on GitHub, describing it as "an illegal and fraudulent site".[57][27]
On 18 April 2019, employees at Microsoft and GitHub created a GitHub repository named "support.996.ICU" in support of the 996.ICU campaign, which they believe could be under threat of Chinese government censorship.[58][59][60][61][62][63]
Reactions
Support
Jack Ma stated that workers should consider 996 "a huge blessing" as there is no way to "achieve the success [one] want[s] without paying extra effort and time",[64][65][66][67][68][27][69] while Richard Liu, founder of JD.com, said that "Slackers are not my brothers!"[27][33]Jason Calacanis, an entrepreneur and angel investor, describes 996 as "the same exact work ethic that built America".[70]
Criticism
Several Chinese media outlets criticized the 996 working system. Xin Shi Ping of the Xinhua News Agency said that the system "violates labor law and overtakes health and the future. It does harm to hard-working workers and is a misunderstanding of the hard-working spirit".[71] The People's Daily wrote that "advocating 'hard work' does not mean resorting to and enforcing the 996 system",[72][73][74] while an editorial in the China News Service said that it is "unnecessary to exchange life for money".[75]
Beijing Daily criticized Jack Ma and Richard Liu for "boasting" the 996 work schedule, claiming that it is "aimed at disguising reduction of salary or lay-off",[76] while Wang Xinya, a writer for Banyuetan, stated that some entrepreneurs disregarded the law and associate 996 with hard work, calling it "poisonous chicken soup" (Chinese: "毒鸡汤"). Wang also stated that the system has nothing to do with employee diligence, but has everything to do with company interests.[77]
Python creator Guido van Rossum described the 996 work schedule as "inhumane" in a tweet commenting on an SCMP article about 996.[78][55][79][80] In 2021, Chinese scholars stressed on policy-makers that "there is a need to reform work policies to realize the lowering of working time per worker in China (and also to curb excessive-work cultures like 996)".[81] Without such initiatives, the dual circulation policy is doomed to fail, they argued.
Legal issues
The 996 working hour system was deemed illegal by the Supreme People's Court on 27 August 2021.[82] However, it has been doubted whether this ruling will be fully enforced.[83][84]
^Such a license would not meet most definitions of open source software, such as The Open Source Definition, as the 996 exclusion counts as a limitation on purpose of use.
^Zhao, Ang (3 June 2018). "不接受"996"是不能吃苦?媒体:合法权益应获保障" [Do not accept "996" is not able to work hard? Media: Legal rights should be protected]. Xinhuanet (in Simplified Chinese). Workers' Daily. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
^Wang, Pinzhi (30 March 2018). "50.7%受访者称所在企业有"加班文化"" [50.7% of respondents said their companies have an "overtime culture"]. Xinhuanet (in Simplified Chinese). China Youth Daily. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
^ abLiu, Jia, ed. (31 January 2019). "默认996工作制背后:被撕掉的焦虑遮羞布" [Behind the default 996 work system: the shame of being torn off anxiety]. 第一财经 [Yicai] (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
^"英报:过劳死提醒中国人"懒散些"" [British newspaper: overwork death reminds Chinese people to "be lazy"]. People's Daily. Xinhua News Agency. 6 March 2014. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 29 May 2022. 信息技术(IT)从业人员似乎尤其脆弱:近日一项覆盖35万IT从业者的调查显示,98.8%的受访者表示自己有健康问题。 [Information technology (IT) workers appear to be particularly vulnerable: a recent survey covering 350,000 IT workers showed that 98.8% of respondents said they had health problems.]
^Zhao, Lei; Wang, Yu (3 September 2016). "58同城员工吐槽"996工作制"" [58 Tongcheng employees spit out "996 work system"]. Phoenix New Media (in Simplified Chinese). The Beijing News. Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
^Song, Tao (2 September 2016). "不学好!曝京东云高管"以身作则"实行996工作制" [To be no good! JD's executives were exposed to "lead as example" to implement the 996 work system]. qudong.com (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
^Xu, Qian'ang (12 March 2019). "京东回应"955工作制":不强制,但要全情投入" [JD's responses to "955 working hour system": not mandatory, but emplorees need to be fully engaged at work]. Guancha.cn (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
^"知乎回应拼多多账号截图:身份真实无误相关回答实为自行删" [Zhihu's responses to Pinduoduo screenshots: No doubts of authenticity, answer was actually self-deleted]. Sina News. 4 January 2021. Archived from the original on 4 January 2021.
^"网传拼多多员工因在网上发布同事被抬上救护车的照片,被管理层逼迫主动辞职、赶出公司?事件真实性如何?" [It was reported that a Pinduoduo employee was forced to resign and kicked out of the company by the management for posting photos of a colleague being carried in an ambulance online? What is the authenticity of the incident?]. Zhihu. Archived from the original on 25 June 2021.
^张瑜 (29 January 2019). 尹淑琼 (ed.). "强推"996"工作制 有赞做错了什么?". 南报网 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
^尹莉娜 (31 January 2019). "杭州劳动监察部门回应有赞"996"工作制:已介入调查". 搜狐 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
^Wen, Jing (5 April 2019). "互联网公司加班问题加剧 40家陷"996"工作制风波" [The problem of overtime work in Internet companies has intensified, and 40 companies are caught in the "996" work system troubles]. China Central Television (in Simplified Chinese). Beijing Youth Daily. Archived from the original on 9 April 2019. Retrieved 9 April 2019.
^Alfred数据室 (29 March 2019). "数据解读|都是哪些程序员在GitHub上反对996?". 澎湃新闻 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 31 March 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
^董禹含 (15 April 2019). "马云强东争相鼓吹"996"背后是变相降薪或裁员". 人民网 (in Simplified Chinese). 北京日报. Archived from the original on 16 April 2019. Retrieved 16 April 2019.
^王新亚 (15 April 2019). 孔德明 (ed.). "半月谈评论:996与奋斗无关,与利益有关". 半月谈 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 16 April 2019. Retrieved 16 April 2019.